Nerman Fatic vs Matija Pecotic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs M. Pecotic

Nerman Fatic
BIH
l
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
w
w
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
30
Age
36
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
230
C. Rank
765
191
Best Rank
206
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$74.0K
Career Money
$49.8K
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed

Matija Pecotic
CRO
w
l
l
l
l
w
w
w
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
30
Age
36
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
230
C. Rank
765
191
Best Rank
206
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$74.0K
Career Money
$49.8K
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed
Head-To-Head: Fatic 2 - 0 Pecotic
They have played 5 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 4 and Matija Pecotic winning 1. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Matija Pecotic was at the M15 Zlatibor, 21-09-2019, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 5-7 6-1 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Fatic | 2 |
Pecotic | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(SF) M15 Zlatibor(09-21-19)
Nerman Fatic
5
6
6
Matija Pecotic
7
1
3
(R2) Croatia F10(10-07-13)
Nerman Fatic
6
3
Matija Pecotic
4
0
N. Fatic vs M. Pecotic H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$73,995 | Career Prize Money | $49,830 |
58.47% (397-282) | Career Total W/L | 68.57% (216-99) |
2 | Clay | 0 |
11 | Titles | 10 |
2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Fatic vs M. Pecotic Match Preview
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nerman Fatic has won 43.66% of points on their second serve, while Matija Pecotic has won 31.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nerman Fatic, in recent form, has won 43.90% of their opponent's second serve points, while Matija Pecotic has won 30.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.01% and 33.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nerman Fatic has saved 56.00% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Matija Pecotic has saved 41.18% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nerman Fatic has won 75.38% of matches played (W/L 49/ 16), with Matija Pecotic winning 80.00% (W/L 49/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 337/ 216), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Matija Pecotic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 75% (W/L 155/ 52), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 22/ 11), where as Matija Pecotic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 80.00% of matches (W/L 4/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nerman Fatic winning 2 times and Matija Pecotic being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 4 and Matija Pecotic winning 1. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Matija Pecotic was at the M15 Zlatibor, 21-09-2019, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 5-7 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:30.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nerman Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 351.14 while Matija Pecotic has played against players with an average rank of 285.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nerman Fatic has won 94% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Matija Pecotic has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nerman Fatic has converted 34.41% of breakpoint opportunities, and Matija Pecotic has converted 66.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Nerman Fatic vs Matija Pecotic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Fatic vs M. Pecotic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
4 | Sets Won | 1 |
26 | Games Won | 15 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
1:25:30 | Avg. Match Time | 1:25:30 |
74% (73/99) | 1st Serve % | 65% (76/117) |
62% (45/73) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (45/76) |
58% (15/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (16/41) |
35% (6/17) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (3/12) |
48% (56/117) | Return Pts Won % | 39% (39/99) |
100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Won | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won → Match Lost | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost → Match Won | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Fatic 52%, Pecotic 48%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Fatic 54%, Pecotic 48%.
Break Points Saved %: Fatic 61%, Pecotic 50%.
N. Fatic Recent Matches Played
M. Pecotic Recent Matches Played

N. Fatic vs M. Pecotic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58.47% (397/282) | YTD Win/Loss | 68.57% (216/99) |
57.45% (875/648) | Sets Win/Loss | 64.82% (457/248) |
53.00% (7462/6617) | Games Win/Loss | 57.26% (3681/2748) |
50.62% (41/40) | Hard Win/Loss | 74.88% (155/52) |
60.94% (337/216) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.69% (45/33) |
44.19% (19/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.52% (13/10) |
0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 42.86% (3/4) |
0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
1528 | Aces Total | 561 |
0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
1486 | Total Double Faults | 461 |
1:19:40 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
509.86 | Average Opponent Rank | 555.57 |
67% (23319/35019) | 1st Serve % | 61% (7737/12776) |
65% (15245/23319) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (5248/7737) |
48% (5614/11700) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (2669/5039) |
47% (1924/4116) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (659/1476) |
43% (15272/35334) | Return Points Win % | 43% (5570/12976) |
20.00% (1/4) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
40.00% (4/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
25.00% (3/9) | Main Tour W/L | 38.89% (7/11) |
53.21% (116/102) | Challenger W/L | 55.17% (48/39) |
63.05% (273/160) | Futures W/L | 78.33% (159/44) |
60% (388/652) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (214/313) |
0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
51% (79/154) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (39/76) |
54% (101/186) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (49/75) |
88% (387/342) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (201/187) |
11% (387/41) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (201/14) |
19% (292/56) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (114/29) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
09:00 AM 26/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.74
W2
2
11:40 PM 25/09/25
Prediction
W1
2.94
W2
1.36
11:30 AM 26/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.65
W2
2.24
08:00 AM 26/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.162
W2
5.2
06:00 AM 26/09/25
Prediction
W1
1.68
W2
2.09
06:00 AM 26/09/25
Prediction
W1
2.62
W2
1.49
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Fatic (M25 Zlatibor)
Fatic vs NedicCould play in The Final
Fatic vs PopovicCould play in The Final
Fatic vs ObradovicCould play in The Final
Fatic vs OrlovCould play in The Final
Fatic vs ChepelevCould play in The Semifinals
Fatic vs MaksimovicCould play in The Semifinals
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
Top Predictions Today
12:00
H2H 6-1
10:30
H2H 2-3
06:00
H2H 4-0
06:00
H2H 0-3
05:00
H2H 0-3
Tennis Events This Week
China Open - Beijing
China
Japan Open Tennis Championships - Tokyo
Japan
Buenos Aires Challenger
Argentina
Jingshan Challenger
China
Las Vegas Challenger
United States
Lisbon Challenger
Portugal
Orleans Challenger
France
M15 Ann Arbor
United States
M15 Budapest
Hungary
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kayseri
Turkey
M15 Otopeni
Romania
M15 Slovenj Gradec
Slovenia
M25 Barueri
Brazil
M25 Pardubice
Czech Republic
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula
Italy
M25 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Zlatibor
Serbia